Conclusion

Written by the author, AI-editedAI-generated, author-verified How this module was made

Heads up... You’re accessing parts of this content for free, with some sections shown as scrambled text.

Heads up... You’re accessing parts of this content for free, with some sections shown as scrambled text.

Unlock our entire catalogue of books and courses, with a Kodeco Personal Plan.

Unlock now

You have now closed the full human-in-the-loop cycle, from manual review, to AI-assisted review, to making both the standards and the process permanent.

Key Takeaways

  • CLAUDE.md is a file Claude Agent reads at the start of every session. Anything you put in it becomes a standing instruction for the project. Your standards written down once and applied automatically from that point on.
  • A skill is a saved workflow triggered on demand. It encodes a repeatable process so you never have to rebuild it from scratch. Rules and skills serve different purposes. Rules shape how code is written, but skills shape how a task is performed.
  • The right way to verify a rule works is to ask for something the rule should affect without mentioning the rule in the prompt. If the output follows it, the rule is being read.
  • The review process you built across three lessons including the seven categories, three severity levels, a clear merge recommendation, is worth writing down. Institutional memory should live in a file, not just in your mind.
  • This is the difference between vibe coding and AI-augmented development. Not that AI writes the code, but that a human decides what good means, encodes that standard, and makes sure it carries forward.
See forum comments
Download course materials from Github
Previous: Teaching the AI to Improve Next: Quiz: Teaching the AI to Improve